Alloy

Formulation Feasibility & Risk Flags

Alloy is the “make it real” agent for Product Development. It takes an approved concept and translates it into viable formulation paths, then flags the risks that cause rework and late-stage surprises: ingredient compatibility issues, process constraints, shelf-life instability, sensory trade-offs, and scale-up concerns. Alloy forces practical clarity up front—what’s feasible, what’s risky, what requires testing, and what assumptions are being made—so teams stop learning expensive lessons at the end of the cycle. It also keeps a clean iteration record: what changed, why it changed, what it impacted, and what still needs to be proven. Built to support judgment, not replace it: your team chooses the formulation direction, Alloy ensures it is feasible, documented, and ready to move.

Primary Outputs

Typical deliverables

Feasibility assessment: feasibility score, key assumptions, and what must be tested to proceed

Formulation option set: 2–4 viable paths with trade-offs across cost, shelf life, process risk, and sensory targets

Risk flags: ingredient compatibility, processing constraints, stability concerns, allergens, and known scale-up risks

Test plan starter: recommended bench tests, stability checks, and success criteria tied to the risks

Iteration log: what changed, why it changed, and what it impacted (cost, risk, specs, supplier feasibility)

Go/hold recommendations: clear next steps and decision gates for moving to pilot and scale-up

Core Capabilities

What it does

Translates concept intent into formulation requirements: ingredients, constraints, process assumptions, and target attributes

Identifies feasibility risks early: stability, compatibility, process limits, and scale-up constraints that cause late rework

Generates option sets with explicit trade-offs so teams choose intentionally instead of drifting through iterations

Creates practical test plans tied to risk: what to test, why it matters, and what “pass” looks like

Maintains clean iteration history and rationale so teams stop losing decisions in email and hallway conversations

Flags where inputs are missing (targets, constraints, claims boundaries) and forces clarity before pilot commitments

Operational Fit

How it’s used

Used By

R&D, product development leaders, process engineering, QA, and co-manufacturing teams.

Used For

Feasibility screening, formulation option selection, pilot readiness, and reducing rework caused by late risk discovery.

Typical Questions

Is this concept feasible with our process and ingredient constraints?
What are the top risks that will cause rework or shelf-life failure?
What are 2–4 viable formulation paths, and what trade-offs do they imply?

Agent Overview